Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on December 30, 2021 at 5:44pm

Not even close.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 30, 2021 at 5:47pm

Some those curves and loops don't seem quite fluid in areas.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on December 30, 2021 at 5:49pm

I agree, Eric.  The baseline is completely off as well.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mupplvr on December 30, 2021 at 7:28pm

Any other independent opinions?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 30, 2021 at 7:46pm

Here is a certified example from the same period that might be helpful. It is very smooth with no overt points or hard angles.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 30, 2021 at 9:37pm

This is said to be typical of one of his secretarials:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mupplvr on December 30, 2021 at 10:25pm

The one I posted looks nothing like the secretarial

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 31, 2021 at 2:31am

If you read, I never said it did. I was posting exemplars to spur interest. So far it is just Mike and I.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on December 31, 2021 at 3:47am

Some of my in-person and known fuller signatures for comparison too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 31, 2021 at 5:04am

Here is your first Richard with the OP.

Click for larger images. Very smooth and assured, different slant, baseline, loops etc.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by rob kunne on December 31, 2021 at 12:13pm

i have a very large al pacino collection and did see many af his autographs and this one could do in my opinion but understand that there are doubts about this one. it's real!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on December 31, 2021 at 12:21pm

Hey Rob,

"Could do" or "it's real!"?

Can you show some of yours? "Could do" and "WOW" are very different responses. I'm fond of the latter when I show my collections.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page