Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Jamnick Jarms on November 1, 2020 at 6:10am

Not all, but most of them. Although I admit thought the autograph before also cannot assess. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by fab432 on November 1, 2020 at 6:13am

Looking at the original template posted by Spaceman you can see the different pressures applied by the individuals signing the paper.  You can also see the imperfections a bit hurried here and there and not perfect.  The picture in the OP shows very careful signatures, even pressure and without any of the imperfections you would expect to see in a set like this. Despite what the COA states seeing this item in person I’m sure Roger or any of the other professional authenticators would give this one a thumbs down IMHO.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jamnick Jarms on November 1, 2020 at 6:54am

I don't know. Of course, Roger and the other professional can be wrong, too. If you can't even believe the experts, who can? 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 1, 2020 at 7:56am

I guess this one is good too? Right Jamnick?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 1, 2020 at 8:24am

I am at the point where I don't trust any of these sets that look like they were signed yesterday. Too much money involved with Beatles autographs, so the forgers are out in number trying to capitalize.  as a one off, they may look good, but when you do the research that Ballroom and others do (and the TPA's do NOT) you can actually see the original that these forgeries were used as the template.  So no, Jamnick, sometimes you can't even believe the experts.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 1, 2020 at 8:31am

Here are a couple more that I think are relevant to the discussion:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jamnick Jarms on November 1, 2020 at 8:55am

Yes Ballroom, all Autographs in this thread looks a bit strange. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 1, 2020 at 11:24am

This authentic set was posted in another discussion and appears to be the templet set for the two examples above.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on November 1, 2020 at 11:41am

Total crap!!!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mel torment on November 1, 2020 at 3:29pm

Thanks for getting to the bottom of this. Obviously a forgery.

Once again many thanks.

Take care everyone

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Keithspoon1978 on November 1, 2020 at 5:23pm

Looks like same forger, they have obviously cocked up with these two fake sets you can tell it is the same paper and pen. Roger Epperson as made another mistake given it the green light.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 1, 2020 at 7:08pm

Agreed, and it just so happens that the two COAs pictured in this discussion were issued a week apart.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page