We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

I recently came across a signed photo of Paul Mccartney 

that bas said likely wouldn’t pass full authentication 

Roger Epperson on the other hand said looks Ok

any thoughts who is a better? Also would you purchase the item? 

Thanks all

Views: 675

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Can you show a picture of the item?

+1. It could go either way.

Paul Mccartney 

Devon, it is shown in another thread by the same author.

Paul McCartney signed CD thread

Ahhhh. Gotcha. Thanks so much, Eric. Maybe this thread should be deleted since it is also being covered/discussed in another...

Hi Devon,

i posted it agin here to make it a bit more easier for you to find 

thanks for looking

Thank you.  This one is tough, although the “cheers” looks off.  That being said, I think it could be authentic, maybe just a rushed inscription. 

Thank you for taking a look at it I really appreciate it, 

would you purchase this item knowing Roger Epperson said looks ok and Beckett said unlikely to pass a full examination? 

Thanks it does 100%% help

Buying based on the authenticator - it's probably the same either way. 

Buying based on the autograph - this one is best avoided. 

+ 1

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service