PLEASE ASK QUESTIONS IN THE DISCUSSION FORUMS, NOT BLOGS.
READ THIS BEFORE YOU POST, THANKS.

does anybody have opinions on these two beatles and john lennon autographs both came from reputable auction house sales    thanks

Views: 3499

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I hate to say it, but I don't like either of them. There are members here better on Beatles than I am, though, so let's see what others have to say.

 appreciated ..thanks

I'm not 100% on the first, the writing looks like his, but I'm not sure if the signature is consistent with that era (when he was with Yoko).

The second looks like Aspinalls to me, especially the George.

Again, wait for some experts!

i only have limited beatles knowledge and could easily be fooled, i have before before but i liked the look of this , the lennon drawing was apparently done and signed in 1970 and does come with decent provenance..for what its worth...  again thanks for the opinion appreciated i really dont want to get it wrong on this

both were sold with photographed listings originally 1999 ish so cant have been done after that if that rules out or in any well known fakers

I like the first john lennon IMO I believe that is authentic. The beatles set I would steer clear from not authentic IMO.

great thanks....i especially liked the j lennon one so of the two im glad thats looking the better

beatles item is not authentic.  not sure about the lennon

neither of these is authentic, the Lennon is crudely drawn and the writing is all off.

There you have it, the final decider!

I'd take Rogers word for it.

thank you everyone... appreciated im gutted on the john lennon but thats the way it goes,glad i recently joined the site   

thank you 

RSS

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2020   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service