We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Beatles autograph

I have a photo with all the Beatles autographs on it would like to see if it is real or not Have had the photo for several years but have never had any paper work on it.What do you all think

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Devon Laney on December 31, 2012 at 11:47am

I'm sorry, I don't believe any of these are authentic signatures.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 31, 2012 at 1:31pm

I have to agree. each of them falls off at some point or another.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on December 31, 2012 at 2:59pm

Me too. Not authentic, in my opinion. The "RG" in "George" is interesting.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 31, 2012 at 3:55pm

I noticed that. also the angular nature of the Paul Mc. and the slant on the lennon. there is something off about every one of these.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by mark peterson on January 1, 2013 at 12:34am

This looks odd to me as well.I dont like it.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 1, 2013 at 1:16am

I think they're real and signed on a not-so-stable surface. Probably in 1964.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on January 1, 2013 at 6:56am

Steve,

I've been looking at these since they were posted, and I am in the middle on them, leaning towards no.

The Ringo really concerns me, he almost never makes his T shorter than his S. and the letter formation in Ringo seems off.

I don't like the J in John, and the George is off. The only thing I really like is the Paul, but the McCartney is very unusual. below are some other examples from 1964.