Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 26, 2013 at 5:57pm

I doubt that these came from Tracks UK, and I doubt that PSA would have ok'd them

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 26, 2013 at 7:17pm

There are a few unusual characteristics that can throw you off, but I actually think that these are good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by FB on September 26, 2013 at 7:39pm

PSA said that they were "Likely Not Genuine."

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by alan david munns on September 27, 2013 at 12:18am

have to say the best and Gregg look spot on

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by FB on September 27, 2013 at 4:55am

That's a good question.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 27, 2013 at 5:56am

if its a quick opinion, there is no detail.  it is either likely genuine, or likely not genuine.  If one signature on a multi-signed item fails, it is deemed likely not genuine.

if you submit thru the normal process, there would be more detail.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Richard Booth on September 27, 2013 at 9:25am

I am not sure on these signatures. I don't think they are genuine.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 27, 2013 at 10:33am

They look as though they were signed on an uneven surface. I did a quick check of the Best and Gregg signatures, and they do indeed look consistent with the others I saw. It appears that the Beatles signed first, followed by the athletes. There's also a faded Ringo signature on the back, by the way. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on September 27, 2013 at 1:44pm

I would say these signatures are genuine. I can't seem to find the auction on Ebay to read story etc

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on September 27, 2013 at 5:48pm

I don't think there's any chance at all that Paul signed on behalf of John and George. Paul's proxy signatures weren't anywhere near that close to the actual signatures.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on September 27, 2013 at 6:10pm

I agree with Ballroom in that these are not Paul's Lennon and George signature styles.  That is pretty clear.

But I also see William's point, which is why I doubt the authenticity of these Beatles signatures.  The Mc is the closest, but there is still something off about it.  the Harrison, IMO is horrible and the lennon is not far behind.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by spaceman on September 27, 2013 at 6:27pm

If these are in fact genuine . What year are we looking at? I still think there is enough there to consider them  legit.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page