We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

BEATLES SIGNED TWIST AND SHOUT EP - REAL?

What do you members think about this one?

http://www.the-saleroom.com/en-gb/auction-catalogues/international-...

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Chad B on February 5, 2014 at 12:32pm

I think it could be good but don't like the look of it with the rubbing.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on February 5, 2014 at 1:17pm

Sale is at an auction house in Spain I've never heard of. VERY suspicious as there are lots of "questionable" items also for sale such as this Dark Side of the Moon.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Peter C. on February 7, 2014 at 4:35am

What is suspicious about this one?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 5, 2014 at 3:40pm

That's true, but these look good to me.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 5, 2014 at 4:25pm

I was thinking Grey Poupon, but okay.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on February 5, 2014 at 5:02pm

I don't know about these. they are close, but I don't think they are authentic

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Samuel Mumenthaler on February 6, 2014 at 12:08pm

Thanks for your critical input, members. To be honest, I am also sceptical about the authenticity of these, though they look real close. Front signed Beatles items are really rare, anyway...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 6, 2014 at 12:33pm

There are several nuances of their respective signatures that look spot on to me. I also think that the damage and aging looks natural. If it's a forgery, there's amazing attention to detail here.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Lewis Reynolds on February 7, 2014 at 1:48am

I think they have a good chance of being real to.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on February 12, 2014 at 10:19am

I think so too...speed, flow, shape and spacing all look good to me. Again, the various nuances of their signatures look spot on to me. The style of the signatures fits the time frame in which they would have been signed in January of '64. The ink looks appropriately aged and the damage looks natural.