Beatles VI Fully Signed Album up for auction

Gotta Have It is auctioning off this fully signed "Beatles VI" LP. 

What do the members think?

Views: 2908

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 19, 2012 at 3:09pm

I dont like the Paul or the John

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 19, 2012 at 4:20pm

I agree about the Paul and John, and I also don't like the George. The Ringo does look authentic to me. 

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 19, 2012 at 4:38pm
I agree on the ringo. It's the only one that has a chance
Permalink Reply by spaceman on November 19, 2012 at 8:55pm

So we have a Ringo 1995, a John 1975, i think a Paul early 1970s and a George?  I think they are a clever fake.

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 25, 2012 at 2:52pm

I think the Paul is more like an attempt at a mid-sixties signature. it looks slowly written, and just does not look right.

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on November 20, 2012 at 7:47am

I like the Ringo...

Permalink Reply by Xperttexpert on November 20, 2012 at 9:33am

ringo is good, the others not. just my opinion.

Permalink Reply by mark peterson on November 20, 2012 at 10:26pm

the Ringo does look good,the paul and george do not in my opinion.

Permalink Reply by Darren Ruskin, III on November 21, 2012 at 9:25pm

i have to say these signatures all good to me..the only odd fact is that they are from a lot of different time periods. looks like a lot of leg work and i would be damned if i let it go for 8 thousand dollars!

Permalink Reply by IGroup Collection on June 5, 2013 at 11:09am

It appears you were the only one who had this one spot on; impressive. Congrats, Darren!

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 22, 2012 at 8:25pm

The "O" in "John" appears to have been written clockwise instead of counterclockwise, and doesn't continue into the "H". Are there any other examples in which those two things occur? 

Permalink Reply by Josh Board on November 25, 2012 at 2:45pm

Darren -- you bring up the BEST POINT yet. On an album, all bands (that disbanded before 1971) are EXTREMELY RARE. Especially a band like The Beatles, which didn't tour.

Therefore, if someone did the "leg work" and Bealtes albums can get $40,000 or more, why this price?

That alone, makes me call BS. As for the look of the signatures, only the Lennon looks bad to me. All others look excellent.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service