Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 10, 2022 at 5:05pm

This is fine IMO, David. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Lewis on January 10, 2022 at 5:25pm

Mr. C, Thanks for the look.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on January 10, 2022 at 5:08pm

Is this a signed photo? Paper?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Lewis on January 10, 2022 at 5:31pm

Joe W., My OP is card stock, the Saul post is from a photo.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on January 10, 2022 at 5:34pm

Ok. Yours has a glossy appearance. I am leaning toward not likely. I would expect the signature to look a bit more rushed than it does. Especially if it was an in person situation.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 10, 2022 at 5:43pm

The card could have been a card sent TTM. Sending index cards was common years ago.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on January 10, 2022 at 6:07pm

This is true, Steve. Although I still feel uncomfortable with this signature.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Lewis on January 10, 2022 at 5:56pm

Joe W., When I shot the image it was still in its ultra pro. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on January 10, 2022 at 5:42pm

PSA Facts has a lot of exemplars:

https://www.psacard.com/autographfacts/entertainment/cary-grant/217

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KaiMi on January 11, 2022 at 4:25am

I believe it to be authentic. Personally, I wouldn't be too concerned about the r-a connection as long as so many other topics and the "spirit" of the sig as a whole are fitting. The dedication looks legit as well.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by David Lewis on January 11, 2022 at 4:34am

KaiMi, Thanks for the look.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page