We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Tags:
Every Reeve I've seen that I know were obtained in person were signed "up-angle/slant" left to right. This is slanted the opposite way, down-angle left to right. Some of the elements look OK, but there's enough here that look unrecognizable as Reeve that I wouldn't be comfortable with it.
Judge, I've seen autographs from all types of stars that were authenticated that looked even odder than this does for Reeve. Most of the Ruths I see with authentication paper, some from major companies leave me astonished. If they authenticate it, it's like Lourdes, it washes away its sin. PSA/DNA quick opinion for $10 might be worth a go. If they give it a "likely Reeve", it may pay to submit it.
Please let us know the outcome. Very curious. Hope this pans out for you.
Not everything has to be about dollars and cents. Remember Owen's 66 cent coin collection in "Throw Mama From the Train":
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fZpfHrTcS4Y
Though worth 66 cents to anyone else, those coins meant a lot more than 66 cents, the memories attached to those coins were invaluable to Owen.
If similarly you feel strongly about the piece, then submission is the way to go, only if it's important to you to know one way or the other if that ink truly belongs to Reeve. And you know what? Nothing in autographs is a certainty. Signed official documents, witnessed autographs; these are certainties. A COA is the opinion of the examiner and nothing more. Like Owen an his collection, the way you feel about the piece and the precious memories attached, something that a price cannot be put on, is far more important than someone's opinion.
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service