Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by N.Steiger on February 19, 2015 at 2:54pm

This is not authentic in my opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Christopher Myers on February 19, 2015 at 3:18pm

Why do you feel this way? Are there any red flags? Here is the COA it came with.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpg, 1.1 MB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by N.Steiger on February 19, 2015 at 7:06pm

They just are not right, not to be cocky but this is what separates the experts from the collectors. It's really hard to put into words the subtle details that go into one's signature that make it real or not real. If you were in my house and we sat down and went over some Chuck Berry signatures with a laser pointer I could show you on what exactly to look for but again, to put it into words is difficult so I apologies. Only people who graph (as we say it) in person can be experts in my opinion and those folks are the best of on this site because we actually have real world field experience because we look past just the signatures them selves. We know who signs, who they sign over times, what types of items they will or will not sign etc....

Having got Chuck many times in person this and other one you posted are not even close to real. Take a look as Bjarne's, Look for the separated "C" and "H" from the "uck" in Chuck. And look for the two "r's" in Berry to kinda look like cursive s's. And look to pay a couple hundred at least for real one. Real stuff from guys like this aren't cheap. I just looked on ebay I didn't see a real one for less then $230 to $250. And those we the shortened C-Barry signatures. You might find just the signature of a junk items for less but a photo or album will be higher. Just remember that when buying autographs, cheap is usually fake.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on February 19, 2015 at 5:17pm

I agree with Steiger, the original posted autograph is not real. This is what a real Chuck Berry shall look like. I got it in person. You see the difference in slant of the letters.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Christopher Myers on February 19, 2015 at 5:55pm

Ok. So you don't think its real because it doesn't have a slant? What do you think about this one? I want to get it but don't know if this one's legit either.

Attachments: No photo uploads here

• image.jpg, 102 KB

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by N.Steiger on February 19, 2015 at 6:44pm

This doesn't look real either sorry.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on February 19, 2015 at 6:52pm

I agree, I don't like the second one you posted either Christopher. The letters just looks off.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by N.Steiger on February 19, 2015 at 6:44pm

That's a nice one. Damn Bjarne, you have some cool stuff.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on February 19, 2015 at 6:53pm

Thank you N.Steiger. You know what it takes to get some nice items in you collection. A lot of hours behind my collection.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by N.Steiger on February 20, 2015 at 3:35pm

How are your feet and knees holding up. Mine are shot lol

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bjarne Soderholm on February 21, 2015 at 5:13pm

I can still stand for 14 hours if I have to, but I prefer not. And it's not as cold here in Florida as it was in Sweden.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on February 19, 2015 at 6:11pm

The original autograiph is not authentic. Letters oversized, spacing all wrong and it looks like those that came out of Australia a few years ago that were bad fakes. The COA is a joke - where is the contact info etc? Cheap home made COA

• ▶ Reply