Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on December 31, 2017 at 3:08pm

Both autographs appear to be atypical to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Zoe on December 31, 2017 at 3:09pm

A typical secretarial? I thought as much. Thanks for your opinion! 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on December 31, 2017 at 9:51pm

They do resemble his contract sigs, so I wouldn't give up on them just yet

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 1, 2018 at 2:38am

Well, that’s good to hear! Let’s hope there’s some Eastwood experts among us here ha!

Happy New Year!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Brian on January 1, 2018 at 8:06am

I am no expert but here is some info I found while digging on his signature.  It appears his more recent signature has become more compact.  Just some food for thought.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 1, 2018 at 1:17pm

I’ve never seen his autograph like this. Interesting.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on January 1, 2018 at 1:20pm

this is his modern common scribble and I wouldn't pay a dime for these

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Joe W. on January 1, 2018 at 8:09am

I strongly believe this was not signed by Clint. Most likely, a secretarial signature.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on January 1, 2018 at 8:20am

secretarial in my opinion

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 1, 2018 at 1:17pm

thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 1, 2018 at 10:45am

OK, so it seems it’s a secretarial, just out of interest, what do you do with your secretarials, PP’s, stamped etc? Keep them, bin them etc?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on January 1, 2018 at 10:55am

Would these conclusions mean that this sig (currently on RR auction) is a secretarial?

I am bidding on this, so kinda need to know

I hope you didn't throw ur sig in the garbage yet Zoe !!!

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page