Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 1, 2018 at 12:01pm

Not as yet haha! Have a look here and tell me your thoughts. 

http://www.autograph-market.com/isitreal/forgery-reference-database...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on January 1, 2018 at 12:07pm

you are comparing an apple and a cumquat.  that signature is from 1963.  40 years makes a big difference.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by goodcat on January 1, 2018 at 12:28pm

that's an interesting choice of fruits my friend hahaha

Now we need to figure out which is the apple and which is the cumquat LOL

I would guess if Zoe's are TTM and post 1985, then it's safe to say they are secretarials. But I'd hang on to them. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 1, 2018 at 1:19pm

I spend half my time sorting fruits when it comes to autographs haha

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on January 1, 2018 at 12:24pm

My concerns about the original images are with the "Cl" and the "d".  They are atypical of anything that Clint Eastwood has signed in the recent past.  I would not be concerned about bidding on a legal document.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 3, 2018 at 6:19am

Did you bid on this?

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page