Clint Eastwood

Recieved TTM about 15 years ago,  authenticity opinions please, secretarial? 

Views: 1152

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 1, 2018 at 12:01pm

Not as yet haha! Have a look here and tell me your thoughts. 

http://www.autograph-market.com/isitreal/forgery-reference-database...

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on January 1, 2018 at 12:07pm

you are comparing an apple and a cumquat.  that signature is from 1963.  40 years makes a big difference.  

Permalink Reply by goodcat on January 1, 2018 at 12:28pm

that's an interesting choice of fruits my friend hahaha

Now we need to figure out which is the apple and which is the cumquat LOL

I would guess if Zoe's are TTM and post 1985, then it's safe to say they are secretarials. But I'd hang on to them. 

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 1, 2018 at 1:19pm

I spend half my time sorting fruits when it comes to autographs haha

Permalink Reply by Mike Shepherd on January 1, 2018 at 12:24pm

My concerns about the original images are with the "Cl" and the "d".  They are atypical of anything that Clint Eastwood has signed in the recent past.  I would not be concerned about bidding on a legal document.

Permalink Reply by Zoe on January 3, 2018 at 6:19am

Did you bid on this?

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service