Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Michael T on September 3, 2014 at 10:24am

I personally do not believe that to be authentic. At least, not when compared to the IP stuff I have.

It also looks oddly drawn to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 3, 2014 at 11:37am

This is where I got a list of possible authentic autographs. The possible authentic examples look like the one above (Michael Johnson report), on the other hand, there are also a couple of examples of secretary signatures that have a similar look about them. Tell me what you think. 

 http://www.isitreal.com/index.php?option=com_mtree&task=viewlin...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 3, 2014 at 11:53am

Here are other examples that look similar...

 http://cinearchive.org/post/76485032745/clint-eastwoods-letter-to-a...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on September 3, 2014 at 3:13pm

Not authentic,probably secretarial.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 3, 2014 at 3:41pm

I haven't purchased it yet. It's being sold by a UACC dealer, Robert Saunders. There is a good chance that it's authentic. But, as it is an unusual signature, it would be difficult to sell-on later. So, for that reason, I'll give it a miss. To be honest, I usually only purchase autographs where authentication is not such an issue.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by michelle on September 3, 2014 at 4:26pm

His stuff is ever so expensive  though. In the past when I've asked for further information re items; - I've got some kind of standard reply saying he doesn't reply to queries owing to high volume of queries

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael T on September 3, 2014 at 5:03pm

I have no problem getting close to $500 for him now.  I suspect people are buying due to his age...

The market has at times been saturated with secretarials. There are a lot of sellers that have no idea what a real Clint looks like.

Most knowledgeable people are aware that if you requested his sig via the mail it was not authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Michael T on September 3, 2014 at 5:07pm

While looking thought my IP stuff I found this older sig. Its about as 'full' of a sig we have ever gotten from him.I hope it helps you with that odd one posted. You can see why I don't like the one you posted.

Maybe someone has an IP really early example.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on September 3, 2014 at 5:14pm

Sorry, I don't think it's real. I have never seen a genuine example with his full first name...it's usually a 'Cl' very closely followed by the last name, which in this case is disjointed too.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike P on September 3, 2014 at 10:08pm

This looks secretarial in my opinion.  Even if authentic, which I doubt, try getting one that is more "textbook" like the one Michael T has posted.  

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rich on September 4, 2014 at 7:33am

As soon as I saw it, it kind of struck me as looking like a preprint.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mikex on September 4, 2014 at 10:15am

I was not sure myself. I,too, have not seen another one like this, hence my initial question. It might be real or it might not. When buying CE photos you have to be quite sure it's authentic. This example raises a few questions that can't be answered. So i will leave it to someone else. Many thanks for your comments. Even if it were authentic, there would be very few people willing to buy it.

Anyway, anyone interested in a signed photo of Henry V111 (SIP, so the ebay seller told me) 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page