We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Are these A4 lithographs signed in pencil ok. They are  by on thin textured card. Like most other items they come it an Andy Peters COA. Were these given to record company management or is that a story. Epperson says they are ok. What are your thoughts

Views: 1008

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think in the 2.5 years you have sought my advice with 143 emails between us I am anything but a malicious person so no, I wasn't doxxing you. And yes, it was me that removed the post.

We'll leave it at that. I've got money invested in DB autographs so it's understandable that i would like clarification and answers. I have not made an allegation against you as, as you said, i don't have any direct evidence. Nothing would please me more that to find out that all this has been a big mistake.

As you have said, I've sent you messages regarding the authentication of DB autographs and on the whole you answers echoed my feelings regarding these autographs.

Who was your question directed to?

What question in particular 

The one I replied to: "Are you aware that this is illegal in the UK. "

That was directed at Andy. 

So where does the community turn for the skinny on all this? Where is the study? What exactly has been proven and, more importantly, what has been discovered that we can look for to tell if Bowie graphs purchased somewhat recently are real or not? 

This is an example of one of those "Bowies'" by Tony Ford on a numbered proof of the 1978-1998 litho of the Heroes Self Portrait:

And the genuine article:

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service