Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on October 27, 2013 at 10:34am

great question Ballroom. I've never seen it either.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on October 27, 2013 at 2:28pm

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on October 27, 2013 at 3:21pm

wow nice find, Ballroom.  I think you saved someone a bunch of money.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on October 27, 2013 at 3:25pm

Thanks. I knew it looked familiar, but not entirely so.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ricky H on October 28, 2013 at 12:51am

Agreed! great call

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by RobTwoRs on October 28, 2013 at 3:33am

Top work guys!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Karsten on April 4, 2017 at 10:35am

Hello Ballroom. Found this discussion. So which one is right and which one is the forgery? Thank you.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Don Webster on April 4, 2017 at 11:40am

I'm with Karsten here...

The initial example is not genuine in my eyes...

Is the 2nd example being shown to prove that??

Help me catch up will ya' please...

And where are these items for sale?

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on April 4, 2017 at 12:14pm

You're much better with Elvis than I am, Don. What I noticed is that both signatures are on pristine receipts, both show similar characteristics, and Elvis has spelled "friend" with two "I"s.

The "To Matt" example is from Gotta Have Rock and Roll and may still be for sale.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Karsten on April 4, 2017 at 1:11pm

Thanks Ballroom for your info. Don, what is your opinion about the two Autographs?
I will let you know what I think. Thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Don Webster on April 4, 2017 at 5:06pm

Hi Ballroom...I don't like either one...I think both are from a "boiler room" type operation that put out many many dozens of fake Elvis in the new millennium.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Robert Chase on April 4, 2017 at 3:08pm

Looks like a typical Elvis to me

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• Next ›
• Page