Harrison signed as Nelson Wilbury - Authentic?

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on March 7, 2016 at 1:57pm

I think it's got a fair chance of being genuine, certainly worth getting a quick opinion from Roger Epperson.

This is the type of item, atypical, that would benefit the most from a COA from one of the recognised Beatle signature authenticators. I'd try investing in a quick opinion as I suggested above and then getting a full COA if you decide to purchase it.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Bruce Juice on March 7, 2016 at 3:00pm

Good to know, thanks. I think Iconic Auctions had one where George signed as Nelson Wilbury but not sure. I know I've seen one in the last year somewhere. If anyone has one to put up here it would be most appreciated.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on March 7, 2016 at 11:30pm

I think it's real. It's his handwriting, and the 'son' in Nelson is the exact same style as he signs in Harrison.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Pete Bendu on March 7, 2016 at 11:55pm

I agree with Edward.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Nate on March 8, 2016 at 8:40am

I also agree. Attached is a close pic of the other known one and if PSA and Frank have ok'd that one then I would say this one is also likely to be good. Did Dylan sign his pseudonym? I've never seen him sign as Lucky before so I cannot tell.

Attachments: No photo uploads here