Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Rock G III on October 29, 2013 at 12:35pm

No its an opinion you are paying for when you get an item authenticated. Had they said they witnessed it sure. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Zarelli on October 29, 2013 at 1:51pm

Did you buy the ball from the authenticator? If not, why not pursue the seller?

I'm not a lawyer, but it seems to me the only way you would have legal standing against an authenticator (who was not the seller) is if you could prove gross negligence or intentional wrongdoing on their part.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mike T on October 29, 2013 at 8:37pm

Did you have a contractual agreement that specifically outlined liability? If not, you do not have any legal recourse (in the state of new York, at least). Zipper is correct that you could claim negligence, but if the party does not have a stake in the disputed transaction that would be a very tough case to make.

There are, of course, a lot more questions that need to be answered, especially if it crosses state lines, but the short answer is the dispute is between you and the seller, not the authenticator.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dan Gregory on October 29, 2013 at 10:24pm

Firstly what loss did you suffer? Did you sell the baseball autograph unauthenticated after it failed authentication and if so what price did it achieve? Second, did the authenticator offer an opinion or guarantee it was not real? 

Usually the terms and conditions are fairly watertight and at best you may be able to recover the authentication fee you paid.

If you went to court and won a case then anyone can then sue and authenticators would only authenticate a smaller amount or just refuse to authenticate most items

• ▶ Reply