We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Authenticity is Everything
Have you guys heard of canadagraphs?
They have several once upon a time cast members and a signed picture with multiple cast members.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on
-
Am not an expert on any of these sigs but the red flag to me is how so many sigs are slanted the exact same way.
-
Permalink Reply by Crystal on
-
here is one from outlaw_hobbies as well. psa dna quick opinion said it was likely genuine.
-
Permalink Reply by Canadagraphs Collectibles on
-
It could be because the vast majority of the population is right handed, plus once 2 or 3 people sign 1 direction, most others are forced to do the same to find space.
-
-
Crystal.
Feel free to email us about the item, and of course, you can look through our site for 100s of proof pics of the OUAT cast signing for us.
-
Permalink Reply by Mike P on
-
Dont know the signatures discussed, but looking at them first glance it seems they were all penned by the same person
-
-
I guess I must be signing ALL the autographs the OUAT cast have signed since they started filming here then for everyone who meets them eh? That sounds logical.
I sure hope the cast start paying me for signing everything for them.
-
-
Instead of going on the defensive/being sarcastic, why not elaborate on when these were signed, show proof pictures of cast members signing, etc.
We've been down this path here before and people who can show PROOF tend to have some merit here.
-
-
As my reply RIGHT BEFORE HIS REPLY stated, theres literally 100s of photos of the OUAT cast signing for us on my site.
Thus my sarcastic quip at someone who literally couldnt be bothered to spend 3 minutes investigating, but wanted to give his lack of expertise on the subject anyways.
If you or him, or anyone else cant be bothered to spend more than 15 seconds "investigating" something, dont tell the world your opinion on the matter is my advice. Leave it to people who actually are going to try & come to a well thought out decision. When I speak on autographs, its after having spent more time investigating the seller than it takes to type out a reply that could fit in a tweet.
Feel free to peruse the 1000s of photos I have taken of the cast at set & off set. You should be able to find more than enough acceptable proof of the hundreds of encounters I have had with this cast. I have JMo & Ginny both featured in my proofs section (been lazy, havent updated it in awhile) http://canadagraphs.weebly.com/proof-photos.html
Of course, my OUAT blog section has far far far far more http://canadagraphs.weebly.com/once-upon-a-time-blog.htmlIf someone was incapable of spending at least 3 minutes to google search my site & to look between those two spots on my site, which are both clearly tabbed on the front page, for "proof", they really shouldnt be upset when their opinions are openly mocked. Do your homework. Dont even have to do a LOT of homework, just do some.
-
Permalink Reply by wascher on
-
Hi, I'm one of the moderators here, and up until your last post, no website address was given.
Your reply to the person making an observation could have been as simple as - we have a website located here www. , with photo's available for you to look through.
We're hoping to make this website more "friendly" and hopefully this is one of the ways we can help do that - by making a simple suggestion :)
Thank you for joining us and sharing your web. Others can now check out what you have to offer.
-Wascher
-
-
Hello Wascher
I dont mean to be rude when I say this, but if someone here is going to say "well I think this or that...." on matters of autograph legitimacy, dont you agree they should actually look into it instead of just flapping their mouth? I do.
The user I repled to with such a snarky reply didnt spend more than 30 seconds investigating. I know this, because it takes less than 45 seconds to google search my site name, find my site, find the OUAT section & see more than the ONE example the OP posted as a deciding factor. I know, I just did it.
My name was given by the OP. So it isnt like the user had nothing to go on.
If he is going to spout off on topics he admitedly stated he isnt even aware of the cast members being discussed, he should be open to ridicule & talking down to if he is going to voice his opinion with no facts, or even a MINIMUM effort to investigating it. I dont apologize for my reaction to him.As for the second guy. Like the first guy, didnt bother to even remotely put in an effort. Instead of taking a couple minutes to look for himself, he got up on his soapbox & went "pics or it didnt happen". So I replied to him with a level of respect he showed me by butting into a conversation that didnt, up until that point, include him in any way, shape or form.
My 1st replies in this thread were respectful IMO. I informed the OP that there is plenty of proofs on my site, a site she surely has been to to have grabbed the image in question. I replied to the 2nd guy about the signatures angles with a logical reasoning as to why that probably is the case. Neither time, do I feel I was being snarky or rude.
Shortly after replying to the 2nd guy, someone stuck their 2 cents in on a topic they admitted to not have any knowledge on, so I publicly responded, hopefully, making them re-think the time & effort they put into giving their opinion on here of matters so important as "is/are this/these item(s) real?" With any luck, me calling him out for it will make him better at it & he wont jump in with an uninformed opinion next time just to see his name on a computer screen. The last guy deserved any lack of respect you feel I gave him, as he showed me the same by A- sticking his nose into a situation he wasnt involved in, nor added any insight to & B - For not taking a couple minutes to investigate himself. He cared enough to talk about it publicly, but couldnt bother to look for himself? I really abhor people who go "yeah, prove it" when the prove is available & takes literally a minute to do. He had the info neccesary to do it, but opted not to.As for your post Wascher. No site addy was given till then because as I stated, more than once in this thread, that info could be found in LITERALLY less than a minute. I dont apologize in how I responded, I dont feel an address SHOULD have been necessary. My ID was given by the OP in the original post.
I can understand your desire to make the site "more friendly". I also think, when it comes to autographs, a hobby/business where there is considerable discussion about legitimacy of dealers & so many more things, it is a less realistic goal. Its still nice to try & make it that way, but I dont think it is realistic.
I'll leave you with this.... When it comes to my site or me, if I feel the person(s) discussing my site, or me, are doing so without any actual time invested, I will reply however I feel is required to the inquiry.
So, if they blindly throw around accusations/assumptions/theories/inuendos etc, I will treat them with the level of intellect I think they possess based on their effort put in to whatever the inquiry was/is.
If they have a more level headed, well constructed argument, even if I disagree with it, I will treat them with more respect & try to reply to whatever their issue/concern/question is more professionally.
When it comes to other peoples items/sites, I will use as much restraint in being purposefully sarcastic/rude/belligerent or any other term people reading this thread feel I displayed & will simply state facts I have on the matter.I'm sorry if you were dragged into this by someone for whatever reason.
Photos
Videos
Groups
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
