We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Any help would be appreciated

Views: 969

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I will say one thing. I would be wary of this particular secretarial:

Sorry Eric... The separated "Ar" the latter ones were connected... This looks different to the secretarial by a long way..

Hello, this is as far as I go today. Too much stress to say much more. This is how I look at things (below). I am looking at the negative spaces, baseline, construction, slants, spacing etc.. Garland was not known for legibility. Perhaps JoeW will chime in. 

Thanks for your input...I really appreciate it...

The secretarial doesnt loop over. The only one...

With the "J"

That is a large feature that does change - she did loop over here and there if you are talking about the end of the "J". Look at the negative spaces and other things mentioned, esp in the "J". More I can't say right now. It may well be fine. Just trying to help and give different perspective.

You are most welcome. I have additional examples I authenticated and sold but they are much later - mid 1960's.

Thanks you are a star... After seeing your secretarial I'm happy it's genuine... Take care..

"D"is so different with the secretarial...

Are we now talking about these signed photos or your contract?

Your contract is genuine. There is no reason think otherwise. IMHO.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service