Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by goodcat on December 4, 2017 at 9:46pm

Which still makes it a mistake. And a bigger mistake by the employer who is ultimately responsible. 

And for the money involved, it can be a costly mistake. 

I looked at this MJ sig and a few Legit ones and could easily see the problem. I don't even study MJ and it was blatantly clear to me, otherwise I wouldn't have even commented.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jason young on December 5, 2017 at 6:04am

It really does stick out like a sore thumb haha

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 7, 2017 at 3:11pm

The slab says Beckett Grading Service (BGS), not Beckett Authentication Service (BAS). BGS is their card grading service that I believe used JSA to authenticate autographs. BGS stopped authenticating autographs once BAS started last year.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on December 7, 2017 at 3:17pm

Wascher, I just noticed you said it was authenticated a month or so ago. Was it unholdered on Autographs 101? If that's the case, maybe they're using the BGS slabs and inserts right now.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by wascher on December 7, 2017 at 3:48pm

It was done within the last 8 months I believe.   On Feb 7th of this year it looked like this:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by AJ Jones on January 7, 2018 at 11:32am

I have seen this being offered for sale on Facebook, eBay and now Pristine Auctions.  Buyer Beware (Imo) MJ Pristine Auctions

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rick Meyer on January 7, 2018 at 11:41am

Pristine will sell anything. As long as it has a COA. They don't care if the signature is questionable or not.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page