Authenticity is Everything

Is this PSA Paul McCartney signed album legit?

I know there has been a lot of discussion about PSA/DNA possibly being "lenient" with some of the items submitted by its bigger clients.

So I was wondering if this Sir Paul signed album might be an example of PSA helping out a friend. It was recently passed by PSA on Dec. 21, 2015 for eBay seller autographs-for-sale out of Cave Creek, Arizona. I think they do a lot of business with PSA.

But is this an authentic Paul McCartney autograph that is being offered for $2500?

There are pics below, and here is a link:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/272090023743?ru=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2...

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

image.png, 1.1 MB
image.png, 1.7 MB
image.png, 1.9 MB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul on December 31, 2015 at 11:47am

Your right Terrier the 2500 to 3500 mc signed lp's seem to sit around. Id say his signature seems to be worth a little more on the vintage era 60s for example.
But it is difficult to gauge like you say.
Just because Paul and Ringo dont sign anymore doesn't mean there is a shortage of signatures to buy.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on December 31, 2015 at 2:19pm

Caiazzo seems to add 500 bucks to the price. Of course just Paul seems to be the norm now (wouldn't want that either).

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on December 31, 2015 at 3:05pm

I don't have any interest in first-name only autographs either, unless it's Madonna ;0) I've actually seen several McCartney cuts go for over $750, but I wouldn't even pay $300 for just his first name.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Edward Siebert on December 31, 2015 at 12:12pm

I think it is probably okbut what seems strange to me is that he was still signing much fuller signatures in 1993, and not just a line after the McC as he has done over the last decade.