Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on November 16, 2015 at 9:31am

AGREE 100% Steve Viola - Not professional what so ever and that is why I do not even want to post over there. 

They post of authentic signatures for ANY year - with out saying the year is was signed or where it was signed etc.  And try to match it to the recent book signings.   Much less tell us where the so called "authentic" signature came from.  

Also most conversations they have regarding all topics is very one sided.  Its a shame actually - they could be providing some decent evidence and discussion but it gets tainted with attitude and witch hunting.  And all the conspiracy theories etc.. 

Mark   

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Viola on November 16, 2015 at 11:23am

Yup, they even took my latest post here (above) and once again put it on their site(I knew that would happen lol).  Yes they are extremely one-sided.  I have not seen any difference of opinions or discussions on  JLL signatures other than that they are all real.  Ridiculous site IMO

Permalink Reply by Chad B on November 16, 2015 at 11:48am

I think the last comparison Grant posted was strong. Some of the nuances from the contract signature are good matches to the book signatures. I believe this certainly points to the possibility JLL signed the books.

Permalink Reply by Steve Viola on November 16, 2015 at 11:52am

Again, as I have stated, they may be proven to be 100% right on things, its just their immature & childish way of posting, slandering Steve, Roger, and others for expressing a difference of opinion to theirs that is annoying. 

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on November 16, 2015 at 12:50pm

Chad B 

The problem with your logic is you are assuming that the one GRANT is comparing the book signatures is real.  

It looks very suspect to me.  I have A LOT of signed contracts from Jerry Lee Lewis that have all been authenticated by JSA.  None look like the one that is pictured from Grant.  I have contracts from 1965, 1966, 1967, 1968, 1972.    Not one look like the one Grant picture.  So unless Jerry Lee Lewis changed his signature in 1969 and then changed it back in 1972…..

Mark

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 16, 2015 at 1:41pm

Chad, the major issue with the books as I see it,. is that they are all cookie cutter signatures.    I cannot see how an 80 year old man who has shown many inconsistencies in his signatures over the years, sat down and signed 750 books the same way.  It just doesn't seem realistic to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on November 16, 2015 at 6:43pm

That's what keeps me the most  from thinking Jerry Lee signed them. No shaky sigs at all. Safer on the fence.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on November 16, 2015 at 1:22pm

Regarding whether it's OK to question whether a celebrity actually signed things they say they signed, Justin Bieber said he signed 2,000 copies of his new CD, Purpose, for fans. Here are a few. Click to enlarge:

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Mark Roberts on November 16, 2015 at 1:26pm

I am sure the Justin stated that "His hand hurt from signing so many".  So that makes them real.

Mark

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on November 16, 2015 at 1:42pm

maybe they were signed by Mr. Whitten?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Sidney Fields on November 16, 2015 at 1:51pm

This is remarkable, Steve.
This kid has some talent.
He's able to sign his name exactly the same way each time!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on November 16, 2015 at 5:29pm

Of course it’s OK. There’s only a problem when there are false claims “fake” and “fraud.” This image represents compelling evidence that Justin didn’t sign the CDs. There’s nothing even remotely close to this in the way of proof that anyone other than JLL signed the books. As far as I'm concerned, the book signatures back up the statements that have been made.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• …
• 54
• 55
• 56
• 57
• 58
• …
• 82
• Next ›
• Page