We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

These look like could be authentic what's you guys thoughts on this?

Views: 1082

Attachments: No photo uploads here

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Authentic, in my opinion. Here's a better pic:

Topman ballroom

based on Ballroom's photo, I agree.  could not see the one in the post very well.

I think it's likely good, too, but "Lennon" would be really hard to authenticate on its own. It was signed on such an unstable surface that I think it would sell for a lot less than more typical examples. What's it being offered at, or what did it sell for?

For me the John signature is pretty typical for the period. I have more of a problem with the condition of the Paul signature.

It's interesting what each of us sees. For me, the L of Paul is way off, and the M is a little unusual, but besides that his autograph is pretty close to typical.

The Paul signature itself looks fine to me. I was just referring to the missing ink.  

the slant of the last half of McCartney bothers me

i  have always got most of my autographs personally, but here is one where i was not there,  any opinions? looks consistent with the period of around 5 years ago

I'm really sorry, but this is not authentic.

hmmm, thanks, i didnt pay much for it but must admit thought it looked good,  glad i usually stick to obtaining in person

There are lots of authentic Macca signatures available for sale, but obviously the demand is pretty high. I'm glad that you didn't spend much on this one.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service