Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on April 6, 2015 at 6:54pm

I don't like it.everything about it looks off to me.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dave Stein on April 30, 2015 at 7:50pm

I agree. I've been studying Lennon autos intensely for several months. That makes  me a novice still.

But shouldn't the h in John also be next to the L in Lennon here?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 6, 2015 at 7:02pm

Looks more like it was signed in Encino.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on April 6, 2015 at 7:15pm

Im with the guys on this.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dave Stein on May 11, 2015 at 8:16pm

Paul,

This signature got past me. I thought it was authentic. Can you tell me what is wrong with it?

Why is it off to you?

Thanks,

Dave

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on May 11, 2015 at 8:21pm

I don't like the massive loops and the rest of its really tight.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dave Stein on May 11, 2015 at 8:42pm

Thanks Paul!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on May 1, 2015 at 7:14am

Nah,...lousy forgery...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Dave Stein on May 1, 2015 at 3:07pm

Jim,

I'm trying to learn everything I can about Beatles signatures. Can you tell me what you

don't like about the Lennon signature pictured above? It fooled me. I thought it had

a chance of being authentic.

Thanks,

Dave

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Rock G III on May 12, 2015 at 7:00am

No way I dont like it . And as for what I find wrong sorry I dont do that. Its like writing an online handbook for forgers. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on May 12, 2015 at 7:39am

Exactly...

• ▶ Reply