Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on April 1, 2018 at 7:46am

not a fan of this one, looks too angular.  but others may disagree.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on April 1, 2018 at 12:43pm

Many thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on April 1, 2018 at 4:18pm

IMO.....it looks OK.....Spring 1963......

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on April 2, 2018 at 1:43am

Thanks again.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KarlKeaton on April 2, 2018 at 9:02am

I think it’s probably good.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on April 2, 2018 at 9:09am

Many thanks

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by BallroomDays67 on April 2, 2018 at 9:04am

I would also lean towards it being authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on April 2, 2018 at 9:09am

Thanks again!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 2, 2018 at 9:49am

These are links to Frank Caiazzo's Beatles study, Parts 1 & 2. Compare the Lennon characteristic to characteristic to the ones in the study and see how it compares:

Part 1: Through 1963

Part 2: 1964-up
Secretarial examples are among the images, labeled "Not Signed by The Beatles," so be sure to check for that. I'm having some server issues, so if the images don't appear right away, refresh the page and they should.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on April 2, 2018 at 9:50am

Thanks Steve. What are your thoughs?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on April 2, 2018 at 10:36am

I share Terrier's concern about some of the sharp angles and the 'O' concerns me, from the 'J' and leading to the 'H'. But I typically judge autographs character by character more than some others.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul Johnston on April 2, 2018 at 11:02am

Many thanks Steve.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page