We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Views: 32173

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

from banquet

There we go….. they also state 14 days for refunds, we are going to have fun here with this mess of an outfit!!!

Wow, that's stunning! I definitely won't be buying anything from them again. Awful! 

Thanks for posting this mate. 

You're welcome. I think id have been happier with no response !!

Surly the red and green circled photo was obvious enough. 

Just receive a reply from Banquet......

Hi, We've spoken to the people at Liam's label who arranged these prints - people who we've known and worked with for many years.
We have no reason to doubt them when they tell us Liam signed all of the prints. They went to great lengths to make these happen, took the prints to Liam themselves, and chose to offer them to an independent retailer. As this was part of a very close chart battle in the week of release, if they'd wanted to entertain the (thoroughly morally objectionable) idea of "fake" signatures, they would have been stupid not to have made five times more of them available.
Unlike some on social media, we do not and will not make unsubstantiated claims about the artists who choose to work with us.
You're entitled to return anything you order from us for any reason within 14 days of receipt. Details of how to do that are below - we do not offer free returns.........
So, I've placed hundreds of orders with them over the years and this is my only return (Ever) . So more than a bit pissed off not to get a prepaid returns label 
I'd better not show my reply!! Just to say I won't be buying from Banquet again.....

Thanks for posting this mate. It looks like that's going to be their template response now to fans. Utterly disgraceful. 

"We have no reason to doubt them......." - Oh really!? Maybe play a game of spot the difference perhaps!? 

From earlier but ......Just a thought but the things that are consistent on all of the recent Knebworth prints are the 'L' starting on the upstroke, The 'G' linking from the tail of the 'm' and the thing that Liam has always done in recent years is combine the tail of the 'a' with the first part of the 'm' - this has always made the end of Liam look similar to an 'ay' rather than an 'am'.... I have seen lots of examples in recent years where he adds 'the dot' and a lot of the Unplugged signed stuff has examples that look like the ones that are allegedly fake on the Knebworth prints.The one thing that is consistent about Liam's signature over the years is that it can be inconsistent. PS I think Banquet are one of - if not THE - best independent music retailer.... I certainly trust that they would NOT rip people off knowingly. Bottom line is Liam has an inconsistent sig....

Its like they've done everyone a massive favour with their "great lengths". Liam ain't signing anything unless he gets something from it. 

They should be thanking us for purchasing, bringing in business, making Liam No.1

Cool kid response

Yeah Liam has been very quiet on Twitter this evening as well when asked about it. At some point, either himself and/or his label will need to come out with a statement. 

Looks like they modified their cut and paste, just for you, you should be honoured.

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service