We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks. 

Hello

i bought this Signed Invincible Cover by Michael Jackson
What do you think it looks good ? your opinion ?

I have already used 2 quick opinions
Once by Roger Epperson
Result: Looks fine to me
and once from Beckett
Result: Likely to Pass full Authentication

Thanks :)

Views: 1780

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Of course everyone can express their opinion, which is why I posted it here :)
So my feeling and my eye immediately told me that MJ is his handwriting.
Roger also said that it looks authentic, and passed authentication at Beckett.
That day, MJ signed over 500 autographs and shook hands with the fans, and each autograph on that day looks almost different.
Understandable with over 500 autographs ?

Totally agree! But even rushed autographs have more authentic characteristics than this one. There is no chance that yours is authentic, i'm 100% sure. Hopefully @Wascher will comment soon.
Here some authentic autographs from this day:

Yes i know them all
Hehe But you really think that every more than 400+ autographs look exactly the same ?
The handwriting and the flow is definitely there for me at my Autograph.

Yes i hope Wascher can comment and Roger.

 You have to understand that during the invincible era, Michael's signature was different to the signature he used in the 90's. Some of us have spent countless hours studying his signatures and still don't get it right. For you to simply look at something and dismiss it without studying it carefully or stating why you think it might not be the real deal is reckless. 

You left this same comment underneath my post as well without any justification.

It would be really funny if mine came back as authentic as well wouldn't it ?

This is absolutely true. All he does is write 'not authentic' on everyone's posts without giving a valid reason. It's almost like he discredits any MJ signature he sees right off the bad because it's so easy to.

If you mean the white Invincible booklet, I say this because I believe it's not authentic.
I'm wondering how anybody can think these are Michaels handwriting. Your booklets would be the first autographs ever, Michael signed this style. 

I don't do this to discredit anybody or to make it "easy" for me. If I really think an autograph is not authentic, I comment my opinion. That's what I thought this forum is about.

Numbers 2 and 3 appear to have the same baseline and slants. Interesting thread.

The letter formations of 2 and 3 appear to have more in common with each other than any of the rest shown.

Oh thats amazing :D  A real collectors piece my friend. Congratulations !

Hi buddy,

Beckett use many different procedures  to validate an autographs authenticity.

They are trusted professionals in the field and I'm confident they gave you the seal of

approval because yours is 100 % authentic.

I believe mine to be real as well. Can you let me know how much time Beckett took to take a look at it and send it back to you ?

That way I have an idea of how long it takes. :)

I agree with you.
I have send it on 05/13/2020
And it was sent off
06/11/2020
Because of covid 19 they took a little longer.. 
But everything still quickly.
They also have a June special offer if you send it there.
Let me know when you have the result my friend :)
I am confident that it will be a good result.

Not a chance this is authentic.   

Just look at the examples Yannick put out for that day of signing.   That is how relatively consistent Michael signed.  The M with the slant and loop is a dead give away.  

And the middle downstroke representing J in jackson.  The authentic examples has a slight bend towards the left.  In the original image, the J or downward stroke is not even signed the same way!

RSS

Photos

  • Add Photos
  • View All

Videos

  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service