Opinions……..

Views: 763

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I think this is real, as long as it's not a copy.

What strikes me as this MAYBE being real is the last part of the signature. This picture was being sold at $25 but over 20-years ago. It was taking out of someones collection this year. So i was told.

Over 20 years ago, you probably could have gotten a John Lennon for $100 or so...I bet. I'm not sure about that, but I do know that even ten years ago, you could get Beatles autographs a whole lot cheaper than now. So $25 for a Jagger might have been a little underpriced, but not out of the question perhaps.
So I guess the story matches. Now a mick jagger signed photo is like $400-$600 now.

The last Jagger SP at RR was $296 this month. Excellent example with great contrast and placement and also on an Official Columbia label still.

Columbia label still?

Jagger @ RR Jan 17 $296.45

"Still" meaning "photograph"...

So your opinion this mick Jagger autograph looks good to you?

Hi,

I was only speaking to the price you mentioned which is why I showed the RR.

What did you mean about "Columbia label still"?

But how does it look to you?

I don't even know which you are talking about - I was only commenting on your observation about pricing with a few comments about qualities.

I think $296 is somewhat low for a Mick signed photo. Prices can move around a lot with sometimes wide variations. Otherwise, Mick may be losing out to Taylor Swift, meaning no disrespect to Taylor whom I like as well.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service