Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by James on January 29, 2017 at 2:31pm

I think this is real, as long as it's not a copy.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JPC3342 on January 29, 2017 at 2:35pm

What strikes me as this MAYBE being real is the last part of the signature. This picture was being sold at $25 but over 20-years ago. It was taking out of someones collection this year. So i was told.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on January 29, 2017 at 4:29pm

Over 20 years ago, you probably could have gotten a John Lennon for $100 or so...I bet. I'm not sure about that, but I do know that even ten years ago, you could get Beatles autographs a whole lot cheaper than now. So $25 for a Jagger might have been a little underpriced, but not out of the question perhaps.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JPC3342 on January 29, 2017 at 4:34pm

So I guess the story matches. Now a mick jagger signed photo is like $400-$600 now.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 29, 2017 at 5:28pm

The last Jagger SP at RR was $296 this month. Excellent example with great contrast and placement and also on an Official Columbia label still.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JPC3342 on January 29, 2017 at 5:41pm

Columbia label still?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 29, 2017 at 5:59pm

Jagger @ RR Jan 17 $296.45

"Still" meaning "photograph"...

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by JPC3342 on January 29, 2017 at 6:46pm

So your opinion this mick Jagger autograph looks good to you?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 29, 2017 at 7:03pm

Hi,

I was only speaking to the price you mentioned which is why I showed the RR.

What did you mean about "Columbia label still"?

Permalink Reply by JPC3342 on January 29, 2017 at 7:35pm

But how does it look to you?

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on January 29, 2017 at 7:45pm

I don't even know which you are talking about - I was only commenting on your observation about pricing with a few comments about qualities.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by James on January 29, 2017 at 7:59pm

I think $296 is somewhat low for a Mick signed photo. Prices can move around a lot with sometimes wide variations. Otherwise, Mick may be losing out to Taylor Swift, meaning no disrespect to Taylor whom I like as well.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• 3
• Next ›
• Page