Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Dan Johnson on May 11, 2011 at 5:16pm

Looks like JSA already reviewed it and approved it. Their expert opinion would be better than anyone on this forum in my opinion.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve Cyrkin, Admin on May 11, 2011 at 11:27pm

Ahhh...you must be a fellow Dale Carnegie graduate.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on May 11, 2011 at 6:45pm

After hearing how so many items have been passed as authentic and turned out not to be, I would welcome some of your opinions as well.  Not that I don't trust JSA, but I'm always interested in what others in the hobby think.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Anthony Bautista on May 11, 2011 at 10:21pm

I think your right on . I dont like how small the signature is and I personally dont like how the signature looks but that doesnt make it not authentic. I havent gotten Stans autograph in person in over  10 years. I did purchase some from a show and that was a long time ago as well . That can be how his new in person autograph looks . Do you know where the person got it signed, what year and when . Stan sells his autograph on his own website.

Here is the link stan-the-man.com . Look at those autographs as Im sure they are authentic.

 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by 2ro69jm8dyt5i on May 12, 2011 at 12:02am

I like it.  Looks like a recent signature.  Signed in the last 5 years.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Steve on May 12, 2011 at 10:55am

I bought it about 2 years ago.  I have not gotten Musial in person since about 1995.  I'm not sure how much his signature has been affected by older age or health.

• ▶ Reply