Paul Mccartney Ringo Starr signed autograph page left by family member opinions please

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 28, 2022 at 9:19am

They appear to have avoided ageing. Macca is a bit shaky. That ink is bright/fresh looking.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james allen on April 28, 2022 at 9:44am

thanks eric, the book was always kept in a sealed bag in a draw, i dont really know much about how ink deteriorates, thanks for your opinion

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Forgers Sump on April 28, 2022 at 9:52am

Agreed. Ringo's is not familiar to me, but McCartney's looks to me "not-sure". It seems odd to me and the actually fresh ink makes me feel uncomfortable. It "brights" like a recent writing, instead a 60 years aged. Just my opinion.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james allen on April 28, 2022 at 10:41am

thanks forgers, could being kept sealed keep the ink that bright?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Forgers Sump on April 28, 2022 at 11:14am

Maybe but I insist, the Paul's one looks to me odd, I see some unsecure details, as if it was made by someone who doesn't have the original flow of a genuine handwriting. There's quite a lack of precision in it IMHO.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by james allen on April 28, 2022 at 11:26am

thank you forgers, i really appreciate your opininon

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on April 28, 2022 at 11:27am

The signatures show no sign of oxidation after 58 years, the paper unusually fresh as well and that is often cheaper paper. I've no doubt the paper is vintage.