Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Gratefulphish on April 23, 2019 at 10:00pm

Last two photos don't seem to be working.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Innuendo on April 23, 2019 at 10:55pm

None of these signatures are genuine, sorry. They are decent attempts but not genuine and that Brian comes from a common forger that's been heavily involved in the hobby lately. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Grungegarden on April 23, 2019 at 10:59pm

The M in Freddie and the B in Brian say it all. The Deacon is wonky too. Roger is too spaced out and blocky. Thumbs down indeed but this comes from someone who studied or traced them because they're not horrible.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Innuendo on April 23, 2019 at 11:07pm

Yes very decent attempts. The B in Brian does seem a bit shaky as well, so it could have possibly been traced. I often have to remind myself that atypical graphs shouldn't immediately be stamped "absolutely not genuine" (I am a big believer in the better safe than sorry motto), so let me rephrase here. This item has atypical characteristics and is not something I feel comfortable saying is simply rushed as it also shows possible hints of tracing. Those two factors combined leads me to say it's an unsafe buy. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by KStar on April 23, 2019 at 11:19pm

I agree. The Brian has the "humpback B" that was typical in a German forger's work last year. The guy that was offering all those fully signed singles if you know who I'm referring to Innuendo?

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Innuendo on April 23, 2019 at 11:24pm

I do indeed. His Works singles are still being sold and resold to this day. Good eye, as he was exactly who I originally thought was behind this Brian.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Andy on April 24, 2019 at 11:11am

Wow so many replies in such a short time, thank you all very much.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Andy on April 24, 2019 at 11:22am

I have a couple more people say they got them in person in 1986.

AF4C686E-199E-46FB-9319-E2D5DBF46A4B.jpeg

0C5996F9-5C91-45DF-BCC4-A1EC55FFCFF1.jpeg

39D22E69-9429-4580-B12D-44C2D1596B95.jpeg

What are you experts saying ?

Thanks.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Innuendo on April 24, 2019 at 4:03pm

Not genuine, and look to be signed by the same hand

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Andy on April 24, 2019 at 9:56pm

Thank you. Also the single Roger signature is fake ?

The seller stated he sent the tape sleeves to Rogers agency adress and got them returned.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Innuendo on April 24, 2019 at 10:06pm

The single Roger signature is possibly the worst fake I've ever seen for him. It also doesn't look like any secretarial for him I've ever seen either. Sorry to say.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Andy on April 25, 2019 at 9:50pm

Thank you again. 

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page