Queen real or not?

1 member likes this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Fran on March 21, 2015 at 7:05am

It's very real

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Martin Georgiev on March 21, 2015 at 7:29am

thanks

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Peter C. on March 21, 2015 at 8:01am

To be honest - I would rather wait for more opinions... I dont like it much - it looks a bit "too" perfect for stuff signed in early 80s....

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Fran on March 21, 2015 at 11:45am

It's what it seems to be: PERFECT

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Patrick1977 on March 21, 2015 at 12:26pm

I would as Roger Epperson for his opinion. Three things that bother me a bit.

1. It Looks nearly to perfect

2. Never saw Deacon only sign with a D

3. The F in Freddie has the Little hooks at the begining and the end of the letter what is quiet unusaul as in all the authentic ones I saw there havn't been.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Innuendo on March 21, 2015 at 2:27pm

Hooks on Freddie's F was indeed common in genuine pieces. Didn't happen all the time, but it absolutely did happen in genuine items. This one however is a fake.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Innuendo on March 21, 2015 at 2:24pm

This is absolutely not real.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Grungegarden on March 21, 2015 at 2:31pm

Agreed. This is certainly a fake. I have also seen genuine Freddie signatures with the hooks on the F as well but this one is bad. The Mercury is much too simple and in the wrong places. The John Deacon is a really bad try. He never signed his last name so simply. This item is bad.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Innuendo on March 21, 2015 at 2:26pm

John is all wrong. He never just signed Deacon as D_______. The Freddie is awful. the Roger is bad for a few reasons and the brian is a decent attempt, but fake.