We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Views: 1911

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's very real

thanks

To be honest - I would rather wait for more opinions... I dont like it much - it looks a bit "too" perfect for stuff signed in early 80s....

It's what it seems to be: PERFECT

I would as Roger Epperson for his opinion. Three things that bother me a bit.

1. It Looks nearly to perfect

2. Never saw Deacon only sign with a D

3. The F in Freddie has the Little hooks at the begining and the end of the letter what is quiet unusaul as in all the authentic ones I saw there havn't been.

Hooks on Freddie's F was indeed common in genuine pieces. Didn't happen all the time, but it absolutely did happen in genuine items. This one however is a fake.
This is absolutely not real.
Agreed. This is certainly a fake. I have also seen genuine Freddie signatures with the hooks on the F as well but this one is bad. The Mercury is much too simple and in the wrong places. The John Deacon is a really bad try. He never signed his last name so simply. This item is bad.
John is all wrong. He never just signed Deacon as D_______. The Freddie is awful. the Roger is bad for a few reasons and the brian is a decent attempt, but fake.

Looks possibly signed by the same hand.

'He never signed Deacon as D ______ ' ?????? Well. This is the proof that you are wrong. Or is it also a 'terrible fake'?
Attachments: No photo uploads here
And incase you need your eyes checked it STILL isn't the same Deacon style! get your facts straight man.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service