We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Would like some feedback on this one. Thanks.

Views: 1385

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Interesting.

I was hopeful of a better outcome. I did think it had a shot but...

I still stand by my first opinion. If that Waters is yours, I wouldn't toss it. In my opinion it is fine.

Thanks, Corey. I thought it had a very good chance. I won't toss it. I've got an 11x14 inch photo to mat it with. I'm disappointed and not sure what I will do with it down the road though. Don't want to risk any more money trying to get it authenticated though.

Don't think you need authentication unless you are selling. PSA should approve it, but enjoy it while you own it. Good non-rushed example.

Thanks, Corey. I will. Appreciate your input.

Here's one more for the road. This is a 1982 signature that looks very similar to the one I have.

Hi Joe,

I am sticking with my original opinion - pass.

Eric

Eric, according to Mr. Epperson you are right. When it comes to music autographs I defer to him and highly regard your opinion which is nearly always on target. Still, I think this one is good so it will go into my "private collection" of "misfit toys". Appreciate you my friend.

Hi Joe,

To clarify, I don't think I said not genuine on the OP, I said "pass" essentially - just a but too unusual (to me) for general resale now or in future IMHO. YMMV vary - and that is the fun! Appreciation is mutual is my fiend.

Best wishes,   

                   Eric

PS - "If everyone is thinking the same thing...someone is not thinking!" - Gen. G. Patton

E

That's what this site is all about. If everyone agreed with each other none of us would learn anything. Even the experts miss the mark once in awhile.

RSS

© 2024   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service