I am concerned about the Frank Caiazzo signature.

Views: 449

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I've seen it before and think it's likely legit. The signatures look good to me.

What do you think about the COA?

The COA is from 1993, but it looks like it was signed by a 10 year old. Nothing like I recall.

I'm not as comfortable with the autographs as Ballroom is. 

Here are better pics of the signatures:

Thanks, Ballroom

I just got home and checked exemplars and Ballroom's better photos. The set looks real to me.

What concerned me most of all was the way "Paul" was written. I didn't recall a U&L of "Paul" that looked like that back then, but a very similar signature was signed in February 1963, which fits in time-wise. I think that the other autographs in the set fit in, too.

Go to Frank Caiazzo's website and send him an email through it with a link to the eBay listing asking if that's his LOA. The signature does look odd compared to the ones I've seen, but he'll be able to tell you.

I sent an email to Frank Caiaizzo. No reply as of now.
I suppose he may not respond.

I see nothing wrong with the signatures.  

The sigs look right for the time period...

The sigs & Frank's letter are both fine.

The signatures look fine,a great piece!!!

Just spoke with Frank and he said the COA is definitely OK.


Blog Posts

The Joy of Sax

Posted by Josh Board on October 18, 2017 at 10:15pm 0 Comments

September To Remember

Posted by Coachgd on October 4, 2017 at 7:00pm 5 Comments


  • Add Videos
  • View All

© 2009-2017   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Community Manager.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service