Authenticity is Everything
What do you think about this McCartney?
What do you think about this autograph? I think the formation of the "a" at "Paul" reminds me of the fakes Ballroom showed. I think a few members here said that the "a" at "Paul" can't look like an "e". What do you think? Thanks!
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on
-
Why do you always say that? What are you trying to imply? What do you want from Perry Cox?
I want to know what you think!
-
Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on
-
not sure if its the same forgery style as what Ballroom was discussing but still a forgery in my opinion.
-
Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on
-
No good. It seems like an improved-upon version of others that don't look right.
-
Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on
-
No thanks...don't like it!!!
-
-
Surprise! Surprise!
This is an authentic Paul McCartney autograph from the new limited edition signed book: Linda McCartney - The Polaroid Years.
What is the conclusion? Not every atypical autograph by Paul is necessarily a fake!
And one more important thing: the "a" at "Paul" can look like an "e" and it can still be an authentic autograph!
-
-
Wow, I guess I'm wrong. It's like Paul himself is copying the work of those copying him. How trippy.
Likely real, but more characteristic of recent knock-offs than a real one. Thanks for sharing.
-
-
Thank you for your interesting comment.
-
-
amazing and interesting how different the actual signed print is from that signature that you posted: (just curious, where did you get that photo of the "signed" book?
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on
-
I noted the same.
-
-
Yea, this is what happens when he sits and signs hundreds of times in a row.
-
-
where did you get the photo? I am not convinced that Paul signed that.
As an eBay Partner Network Affiliate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Get Our Newsletter
© 2026 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
