We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

What do you think about this McCartney?

What do you think about this autograph? I think the formation of the "a" at "Paul" reminds me of the fakes Ballroom showed. I think a few members here said that the "a" at "Paul" can't look like an "e". What do you think? Thanks!

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul on December 31, 2019 at 2:27am

Ask your mate perry

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on December 31, 2019 at 3:01am

Why do you always say that? What are you trying to imply? What do you want from Perry Cox?
I want to know what you think!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on December 31, 2019 at 4:53am

not sure if its the same forgery style as what Ballroom was discussing but still a forgery in my opinion.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on December 31, 2019 at 7:18am

No good. It seems like an improved-upon version of others that don't look right.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Jim Cushman on December 31, 2019 at 8:55am

No thanks...don't like it!!!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on January 2, 2020 at 12:13am

Surprise! Surprise!
This is an authentic Paul McCartney autograph from the new limited edition signed book: Linda McCartney - The Polaroid Years.
What is the conclusion? Not every atypical autograph by Paul is necessarily a fake!
And one more important thing: the "a" at "Paul" can look like an "e" and it can still be an authentic autograph!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Invest_In_Graphs on January 2, 2020 at 5:44am

Wow, I guess I'm wrong. It's like Paul himself is copying the work of those copying him. How trippy.

Likely real, but more characteristic of recent knock-offs than a real one. Thanks for sharing.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Daniel Alayof on January 2, 2020 at 6:43am

Thank you for your interesting comment.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by terrier8HOF on January 2, 2020 at 6:45am

amazing and interesting how different the actual signed print is from that signature that you posted: (just curious, where did you get that photo of the "signed" book?