Which Paul McCartney autograph would you prefer? (w/ pics)

For the same price, which of Paul's autographs would you prefer? The 8x10 signed photo with personalization or what PSA/DNA calls a "cut" signature on a full page without personalization.

The photo is authenticated by JSA, while the "cut" is authenticated by PSA/DNA.

The pics are below.

Views: 1102

Attachments: No photo uploads here

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by a pug called eva on December 25, 2014 at 11:24pm

$850 for the cut sounds steep to me. I must be out of touch. When I bought my "Paul only" signed photo it was less than £200, though that was around 15 years ago and at an auction house outside London. I don't subscibe to the London catalogues anymore but is a Paul on paper reallly touching $1,000? I'd go photo, postcard and cut by the way.

Permalink Reply by Paul on December 25, 2014 at 11:53pm
Guess it depends where you buy them from a postcard from tracks UK would cost me around 1200 Au dollars 650 pounds. The cut would be less but not by much.

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service