We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.
Replies are closed for this discussion.
Bryan -
Is this coming from a reliable source? It has some characteristics of later Churchill, imho. This rather than the early 1910's years when he was serving as First Lord of the Admiralty (which the notepaper would seem to possibly indicate). The ink itself looks odd in it's presenting uniformity.... with a lack of natural application and drying/aging nuance of what would now be over 100 yrs. old.
My feeling on the above provided PSA example is that it is later secretarial (I believe that I have seen that style in thank-you notes, etc. to people and organizations that he was not necessarily intimately connected with). The RR looks to be better (but I believe later).
Perhaps other will comment with more thoughts.
I do not like the presentation at all.
p.s. He's highly forged, as you are probably aware, Bryan.
Good day again Eddy,
The seller is an antique dealer and not an autograph dealer. So I take them to be neither a reliable source nor a malicious one.
Thank you for your input as usual Eddy and Eric!
Wise move. Most welcome :-)
I took the form of the OP to be much later in appearance.
Bryan -
I think you are making a good decision to pass on it.
I pulled the image I supplied from a site called CHURCHILL BOOK COLLECTOR. They have wonderful, premium material (eg. the Churchill letter to T.E. Lawrence...WOW!). But the site also can serve as a great reference source with his inventory at any given time:
https://www.churchillbookcollector.com/searchResults.php?category_i...
Posted by CJCollector on November 27, 2024 at 2:23pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 11, 2024 at 6:03pm 0 Comments 1 Like
Posted by CJCollector on November 9, 2024 at 2:32pm 7 Comments 0 Likes
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin. Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service