"They are not rushed any more than any autograph that I have seen in the past 20 years is 20 years."

"Trying to look for a good deal on eBay, I see. It's cheap but not a good deal."

"Let's see if we can all agree that either: 1) Informed bidders didn't want competition, or 2) The naysayers were all wrong, despite being informed on Beatles autographs. When it's broken down that way.........."

"You make good points, which gives support to the idea that anyone willing to pay $6,000 or so felt they had a chance to win the lot, and chances of winning increase when there is less competition. "

"It's not okay to have an opinion? That's one person's opinion, I suppose.  Were adverse opinions meant to dissuade potential bidders? Maybe. But that would serve people right - why should someone with years of knowledge hand…"

"HDN looks so clean it might have been signed yesterday. And both are such fully-spelled autographs. The buyer might have a hard day's night after doing more research."

"Likely no good. "

"Suspect. I don't recall seeing one like that. Perhaps Ringo and George were in the album and someone wanted to boost it by adding John. Who knows...."

"No."

"Lennon's "h" looks unusual, and there's no attempt at an "n". "

"One is not at all ready to buy Beatles autographs if this appears real."

"I think it's off."

"I remember these from Julien's. The one on the far right seems to have a pre-print pattern. The second one from the left appears fine."

"It's fine."

"It looks fine to me. "

"Hmmm... $1,719.60"