"These are the cleanest autographs I have ever seen. What I notice is that George has the same darker bits in his G "curves". That is very strange. When I see such to good to be true sets I get suspicious."

"This was to be a reply to Conker. Apologies."

"must be using single line fonts if plotting"

"Puh - this looks as someone has used scans that might be altered slightly in a plotting process? This would be terrible."

"Thank you. To me that is fatal for the OP LP."

"Found here"

"We are in agreement. That degree of alignment is not humanly possible. What is the source of the second set of signatures in your image?"

"I still think plotted especially based on their other items. Small differences at the end of names and the altered placement of individual sections would be super easy to do in a vector editing program. When tracing the John it looks like they made…"

"What is your interpretation of these images Conker? I know what I think."

"What do you see Conker?"

"That's a problem. Those are my thoughts."

"Thoughts?"

"For me first place I would check would be end of the signature. The OP looks to be ballpoint to me, but some of their other inventory was felt tip and very flat looking. The Stones one looked gel pen to me which hides the dotting less than ballpoint."

"ta.  i couldnt out what it meant"

"These autopen devices do not necessarily always have a dot near start and end of strokes but usually will at the tail end of a stroke. They can plot the vector in reverse so that the tail end might display a more natural taper in effort to throw…"

"Just goes to show that autograph authentication is as much an art as a science - or perhaps even more so."