Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on May 8, 2017 at 3:36pm

I'm giving a quick opinion> it looks close.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on May 8, 2017 at 4:29pm

I personally believe it's authentic.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on May 8, 2017 at 4:10pm

Here ya go,dug one of mine out. Looks pretty darn close. Love this guy. From what I know usually a good signer but not a raccer (one per not signing a stack). Great singer and wish the real Genesis would return!

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on May 8, 2017 at 4:24pm

Well said Ian, I dig they're early work too.  This album is fantastic: Nursery Cryme and Foxtrot.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on May 8, 2017 at 5:43pm

Peter is a theatrical genius.  And, he incorporates it into his music.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on May 8, 2017 at 4:39pm

I don't know this signature, but I searched for that on eBay and those "photo proof" pictures are generic and mean nothing at all. "Exact Proof" should be just that. Those picture show Gabriel signing a copy of this somewhere, sometimes for someone. You can not see any signature or anything else. It is a generic photo. Perhaps the signature is good, I don't know, but that is not "exact proof" in my book. Not sure why it is listed as such?

There is a thread going on right now about "proof photos".

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on May 8, 2017 at 5:12pm

There is a photo of Peter Gabriel with his arm extended like meeting another's hand (probably the seller) and they were albums in his hand - one of which was mine. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on May 8, 2017 at 5:22pm

"There is a photo of Peter Gabriel with his arm extended like meeting another's hand (probably the seller) and they were albums in his hand - one of which was mine." - Nicholas

No. "Probably the seller" says it all. You are making an assumption. Maybe that album was mine - show it was not. How can you know the album was certainly the one offered if it is not in any photograph in any way? I don't like when sellers claim "photo proof" and show a generic photo. Signature may well be fine, but to believe that "proof" as shown means anything would be an error. 

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on May 8, 2017 at 5:27pm

You're right Eric.

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on May 8, 2017 at 5:30pm

Hi Nicholas, Not interested in being right, just lending a hand :)

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by nicholas pansini on May 8, 2017 at 5:40pm

All Good

• ▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Ian Baldock on May 8, 2017 at 5:14pm

Its only exact proof if it shows the exact item with pen on item. Nothing else. That's been one of my pet peeves forever when I go to look at something and see the generic "proof" pic. The sellers only do themselves a disservice, as it looks sketchy when they claim otherwise. I think you're safe on this graph though.

• ▶ Reply

• ‹ Previous
• 1
• 2
• Next ›
• Page