We are an eBay affiliate and may be compensated for clicks on links that result in purchases.

Signed Pink Floyd "The Wall" CD. Real or fake??

Hello

Need some help. Got this from a friend and He bought it a few years ago from a Collector who travelled around the world to get some signatures.

It's signed by Rickhard, David and Nick.

Is it real or fake??

0 members like this

Attachments: No photo uploads here

IMG_3640.JPG, 485 KB

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Gary Lucero on July 20, 2017 at 2:39pm

got these with my brother in Dallas recently...I am gonna keep the cd and one photo and sell the other one on Ebay....here is the photo of him signing for us ......pretty cool.....

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 20, 2017 at 3:15pm

Excellent! Lucky you (and your brother)!!! Lovely CD - what year pressing?

Permalink Reply by Matt Wisdom on July 20, 2017 at 3:43pm

Hi Gary, is he still doing one item per person?

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 20, 2017 at 4:08pm

Yes, still one per? I am in a (happy) quandary! My collection criterion dictate all sigs must me contemporary to the (usually vintage) signed item. So, that means the Us & Them 2017 poster/flat from the preorder.

But, I have a b/w 1982 still of Waters explaining a scene to Little Pinky and Mum in the garden from the Wall. That - a vintage still yes - but it might not HAVE to bear a 1982 sig. I mean, who has this signed? I've never seen anything like it. Black Sharpie would do. It seems good - Floyd, but really him (The Wall, just him shown, and his pose reminds me of when he is trying to explain rock in the Pompeii video). Click for full image. Something about this photo I like a lot. It is certainly unusual. Sort of behind the scenes. Might go for this. I expect he might be thrilled to see/sign it. Who has seen a photo of Little Pink signed by Roger?

For anyone playing along. I am working on a set of equations that can be modified by each collector to help make decisions that are actually quantifiable and visual. So far, you might know this as my list of "Things to consider when making a purchase" but it has grown considerably to include many, many qualities.

Permalink Reply by Peter C. on July 22, 2017 at 4:21am

Have to say that these ones are incredibly awful. :( Maybe long row of many people and therefore he rushes them as much as he can? :(

Permalink Reply by Paul Hakimian on July 19, 2017 at 6:02pm

Very nice piece!

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Matt Wisdom on July 19, 2017 at 6:19pm

Thanks, Paul.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 19, 2017 at 7:54pm

Here is one of my Gilmours, 2002

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on July 19, 2017 at 7:58pm

And another 1984:

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Matt Wisdom on July 20, 2017 at 4:59am

Very nice. Interesting that in those days his autograph varied rather. The top one hasn't got as much overlapping of the letters from first to second name. Rare to see him sign his surname below his first name (on the second one), though I guess he did that due to lack of space. Thanks.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by john on July 20, 2017 at 11:12am

Here is how his current signature is looking

Attachments: No photo uploads here

20170720_121058.jpg, 604 KB
20170606_083449.jpg, 3.2 MB

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Christopher on July 20, 2017 at 4:30pm

I'm really lucky to have 6 Gilmour signatures. This is the best one, not the best piece, but the best signature, on a publishers proof page from the Shine On box set. Our friend Paul H has one too, which I've been trying for 2 years to talk him out of :)