Authenticity is Everything

The site is slow right now. We'll be back to full speed ASAP. Our apologies.

Elvis Signature real ?

What would you think of this signature ?

http://auction.graceland.com/Elvis_Presley_Signed_Las_Vegas_Interna...

Not the most appealing one since its on an invoice and the piece of paper is worn out due to framing.

0 members like this

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 13, 2017 at 4:46pm

Some of these autographs are investments, whether you like it or not. In 30 years time a number of these graphs will be considered in the same way historical documents are, in a pop culture, my Jim morrison autograph is close to 60 years old, add 30 years on that, it will be close to a hundred, with no more to be signed. Unlike your modern funko pop , guitar scratch plate graphs, real graphs that will stand up over time.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tiziano Vianello on August 13, 2017 at 11:34pm

There is a real value... Never go up this that value... It's a gret error ... Story? But because the autographs of chuck berry, and james brown have a very low value??

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 13, 2017 at 11:47pm

No error!
Chuck signed for decades, morrison didnt.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tiziano Vianello on August 14, 2017 at 1:14am

It's not for this thing... Sometimes yes... But not always... Also paul mccartney signed for decades, U2... And bob dylan? These have high value... There are iconics pop which have high and high value... And not iconics artists which had made the story of music (jamed brown, chuck berry, muddy waters and other) which have a very low value.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Paul on August 14, 2017 at 1:18am

Im going to have to educate you Tiziano.
U2 shouldn't be in the same sentence.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Cogo on August 14, 2017 at 7:29am

Don't push it Paul! No bad-mouthing of U2 on my watch... ;-)

http://live.autographmagazine.com/photo/photo/listForContributor?sc...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Morrison123 on August 14, 2017 at 5:28am

I d say compared to other lots this one got sold for about the same price as other unattractive signed pieces like lots 15/24/44/ 93 (!!!) . I would beilieve it could reach higher than 2k $ so I think its a good price. what do you think?

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Karsten on August 14, 2017 at 6:34am

"other unattractive signed pieces like lot 15, 24, 44, 93" In my opinion lot 15 isn't unattractive. Nice picture in good condition with a good autograph. I like it.

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Tiziano Vianello on August 14, 2017 at 6:44am

Waiting for other graceland auctions... The only good signatures in this auction were the check and the document of 50'... The Only with a good price was the check...

▶ Reply

Permalink Reply by Karsten on August 14, 2017 at 7:19am

Lot 15 and 33 are also fine signatures. But you're right. Most signatures are not good. The documents are very interesting but expensive too. Even the handwritten notice are very expensive. Let's see what will come in January 2018 ...