Thoughts on this one welcome.

Views: 812

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Bogus unless he sgd differently in his early age ?

I agree. Much different. It appears to possibly be a 1950's era signature if authentic. It is signed on the back of this picture.

The OP shows some characteristics of his later style. It could be a case that it's authentic but such an early example that 98% of collectors would doubt it. Thanks for all your help posterguy!

Shaws-done-in-sharpie-prolly-forged.....afaik,he-didnt-use-them-with-fanmail

RSS

© 2025   Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Service