Jason, Not a fan of this one. I see a lack of connection in the a to g in Cagney as a major characteristic flaw. I am 70/30 against this being real……in my humble opinion.
Many thanks, David. Great observation! Here's a close up of another - same photo, same period - where you can see the same stroke connecting the a and g, which makes me wonder if it's the writing insrument. I do like the second signature better, but the photo itself has more damage.
Thanks for sharing, David. When 80 years old you reach, sign as good, you will not... I guess. I'll try sending them in for certification to sell one. No use holding on to both.