We're an eBay affiliate and may be compensated on purchases made through clicks.
Authenticity is Everything
Richard Nixon Signature
Looks like gel pen, what to look for in Nixon signatures? It is a cut and I do not have a date contex. Any thoughts community?1%20Nixon%20victory%20Arms%20%283%29.JPG
That is my best close-up.
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Dale J. Outhouse on
-
With this signature you see the edges having some bleed and does that indicate a non-autopen. also the variance in the thickness of the lines, would that indicate how a hand/wrist may move when signing?
-
Permalink Reply by Eric Keith Longo on
-
There is no reason an Autopen can't bleed. Perhaps the paper sizing was old. But this does look mechanical.
-
Permalink Reply by JK on
-
I personally am not so much worried about autopen (but who knows), but I am not certain that it is not secretarial. Too bad there is no context about origin, as knowing when it was signed would be very helpful.
The general form is that of Nixon's, though.
-
-
Doesn't look like live ink.
-
-
Perhaps some sort of facsimile print.
Photos
Videos
Groups
© 2024 Created by Steve Cyrkin, Admin.
Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
